Archives · Official document · Italian Republic

Decree of 21 January 1999.

Minister of Grace and Justice.

The reference legal act for the family's present nominal and titular standing: addition of the surname Gallone, cognomisation of the predicates of Tricase and Moliterno, succession of the princely titles to the House of Guerri dall'Oro.

On 21 January 1999, the Minister of Grace and Justice of the Italian Republic issued the decree that constitutes the reference legal act for the family's present nominal and titular standing, Guerri dall'Oro Gallone di Tricase e di Moliterno. The measure formalises the passage of the princely titles from the House of Gallone — extinguished with Maria Bianca Gallone, the last Princess, who died in 1982 — to the House of Guerri dall'Oro, and at the same time recognises the historical-family heritage linked to the Gallone family in the Salento.

The decree.

Minister of Grace and Justice · 21 January 1999
The disposition

The Decree of the Minister of Grace and Justice of the Italian Republic establishes three things: Addition of the surname GALLONE to the House of Guerri dall'Oro; Cognomisation of the predicates of TRICASE and MOLITERNO; Succession of the titles of Prince of TRICASE and Prince of MOLITERNO from the House of Gallone to the House of Guerri dall'Oro.

I.
The succession of Maria Bianca Gallone

A first question concerns the right of Maria Bianca Gallone (1895–1982) — a "natural" daughter but "acknowledged" immediately by her father — to succeed to the titles of Prince of Tricase and Moliterno.

Maria Bianca's mother, Giuseppina Moncada, already married to Nicola Gaetani, Duke of Laurenzana, ran away to live with Pietro Giovanni Battista Gallone. A huge scandal in Naples, which explains Maria Bianca's birth in Paris and the fact that her mother's name did not appear on the birth certificate. Despite this, Maria Bianca, immediately acknowledged by her father, always bore the name and titles of her House. The situation was legitimised in 1924, after the death of Nicola Gaetani, by a formal marriage of Maria Bianca's parents.

According to nobiliary law, titles and predicates are transmitted only through "legitimate and natural" filiation. Excluded from the succession are adopted children ("legitimate but not natural") and illegitimate children ("natural but not legitimate").

Natural children, even when acknowledged, do not succeed to nobiliary titles and predicates unless they are "legitimated by subsequent marriage" or legitimated by Royal Decree. Legitimation by subsequent marriage took effect ex tunc, that is, from the day of conception. According to the R.D. of 1943, "i figli legittimati per susseguente matrimonio succedono nei titoli e predicati al pari dei figli legittimi" (children legitimated by subsequent marriage succeed to titles and predicates on a par with legitimate children).

II.
The addition of the surname Gallone

As for the meaning of the addition of the surname "GALLONE", it must be recalled that often, in history, important noble families have become extinct in other families.

III.
The cognomisation of the predicates of Tricase and Moliterno

The cognomisation of the nobiliary predicates "DI TRICASE E DI MOLITERNO" requires a technical clarification. A "nobiliary predicate" is the name of an ancient fief joined to the "title of nobility". The XIV transitional provision of the Constitution of the Italian Republic, which came into force on 01.01.1948, reads: "i titoli nobiliari non sono riconosciuti; i predicati di quelli esistenti prima del 28 ottobre 1922 valgono come parte del nome" (nobiliary titles are not recognised; the predicates of those existing before 28 October 1922 are valid as part of the name).

By this immediately applicable norm, the Constitution conferred a genuine subjective right to the "cognomisation of the predicate" in favour of those to whom, prior to 28 October 1922 (March on Rome), the connected nobiliary title belonged. The Constitutional Court (judgment no. 101 of 08.07.1967) clarified that the cognomisation of nobiliary predicates may be obtained only with reference to predicates on which rest those nobiliary titles existing before 1922 and recognised (by judicial or administrative measure under the former monarchical Order) before the entry into force of the Constitution.

Finally, it should be noted that under the former order a nobiliary title was to be considered existing independently of administrative or judicial recognition, which had only a function of ascertainment.

The "predicate", whose "cognomisation" is provided for, has an evident nobiliary origin and nature, so much so that, according to the constant case law on the matter, the Magistrate cannot grant the "cognomisation" except after having duly ascertained the legal existence and entitlement of the "nobiliary title" to which the "predicate" whose addition is requested is linked.

IV.
The Neapolitan Female Succession

It remains to be established whether the "Neapolitan Female Succession" is still applicable. The Kingdom of Italy, in 1896, promulgated a Decree declaring valid the nobiliary succession rules in force in the pre-unitary States, among them those relating to the "Neapolitan and Sicilian Female Successions". In 1926 a new R.D. repealed, as jus novum, the earlier laws still in force throughout the territories of the Kingdom, supplemented by another R.D. of 1943 concerning the new rules for the Consulta Araldica and for successions to titles. The "Female Succession" was therefore repealed.

With the passage to the Republic the situation changed: the Constitutional Court (judgment of 08.07.1967, no. 101) formally abolished the entire nobiliary-heraldic legislation of the Kingdom of Italy from 1922 (March on Rome) to 1946 and denied any judicial organ of the State competence in matters of nobiliary law. As a legal consequence, the ancient succession rules in force at the time of the original concession of the title are restored, and therefore also the Female Successions, admitted in 1896 and abolished by the subsequent Orders.

From the annexed documents (cf. Marco Lupis Macedonio Palermo di Santa Margherita), the restoration of the Neapolitan Female Succession is easily deduced.

V.
The Royal Assent (Reale Beneplacito)

A final question concerns the necessity of the Royal Assent (Regio Assenso), with particular reference to the Neapolitan Female Succession of nobiliary titles. In reality the Royal Assent was neither necessary nor required in the case of the simple transmission of the title, once it had become merely honorific, emptied of its link to a feudal property. Such transmission of titles constituted a "perfect right", which required no confirmation, but rested its legitimacy on the ordinary hereditary succession from father to son (or from father to daughter, or from mother to son, or from mother to daughter in the case of the Kingdom of Naples).

From the annexed documents (cf. Marco Lupis Macedonio Palermo di Santa Margherita), it is easily deduced that in the Kingdom of Naples:

• until the Law abolishing feudalism of 1806, "non era necessario alcun provvedimento formale (Regio Assenso, pagamento di alcuna tassa o "relevio", ecc.) per la trasmissione del solo titolo, né per linea maschile, né per linea femminile" (no formal measure — Royal Assent, payment of any tax or "relevio", etc. — was necessary for the transmission of the title alone, neither through the male line nor the female line); • after 1806, when "i titoli nobiliari furono ridotti a mere distinzioni onorifiche ed a semplici aggiunte al nome di famiglia" (nobiliary titles were reduced to mere honorific distinctions and to simple additions to the family name), personal investiture was no longer required, neither through the male line nor the female line.

Go to The House Guerri dall'Oro Gallone Explore →